![\"Mem](\"http:\/\/sthelensresidents.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/Mem-Park-slide-1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nSubsequent to seeing these results, Cabinet member Cllr Tim Ahern asked that the consultation exercise be extended into a second phase, with further postcards delivered to residents in a wider radius from the park (650m rather than the original 400m). \u00a0This ‘phase 2’ of the consultation ends on November 30th.<\/span><\/p>\n The survey form remains available on the RBKC website at this link<\/a>. \u00a0The website now has a note asking people not to return a second response if they did so in the first consultation. \u00a0This was not clear at the start of ‘Phase 2’.<\/p>\n When discussed at the open meeting of St Helens Residents Association\/StQW Forum on 9th June 2016, the clear majority view was that a floodlit artificial pitch is not what local people want to see in the park.<\/p>\n There are obvious issues of noise and light pollution for immediate neighbours. \u00a0For other visitors, the high wire fencing would detract from the views of what has always been an extensive grassed open space. \u00a0Use of this part of the park becomes limited to a single activity, in what has always been a family park oriented park with its regular dog walking community. \u00a0All weather pitches are already available at Westway.<\/p>\n These views were confirmed by the responses to the ‘phase 1’ survey, as shown below:<\/p>\n A two stage consultation exercise, covering two different areas, is confusing enough. Even greater confusion has arisen from the wording used in three different versions of the Council’s Parks Strategy 2016-25. \u00a0 <\/em>A first version of this document was considered by the Council’s Public Real Scrutiny Committee last March, and a second by the Council’s Cabinet in May. \u00a0A\u00a0third<\/a>\u00a0version was launched in June and remains on the Councils website. \u00a0 The changes of wording in relation to the first ‘objective’ of the Strategy for Memorial Park is shown in the slide below:<\/p>\n We have been assured by RBKC officers that the third set of wording above is that included in the ‘final’ version of the Parks Strategy, and that no Council decision on an all-weather pitch has yet been taken. \u00a0But various exchanges between Pangbourne Avenue residents and Cllr Nick Paget-Brown (Council Leader) suggest that a decision has already been made. \u00a0The Ask Nick session<\/a> at St Helens Church on November 23rd may provide clarity.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Prince William came to Memorial Park prior to Remembrance Sunday, to designate the park as a Centenary Field. \u00a0These designations were introduced recently as part of the First World War commemorations, in a programme organised by Fields In Trust<\/a>.<\/p>\n The designation will give added protection to the park as open space. \u00a0As far as we can make out, it does no affect whether part of the park becomes an all-weather pitch. \u00a0If the Council were to proceed with such a proposal, aspects such as floodlighting and fencing would need planning permission. \u00a0Public consultation on a planning application would also be required.<\/p>\n We hope that matters will not reach this stage, and that the Council decides without further delay to use the \u00a3150,000 sum already secured through a planning agreements, to install better drainage and refurbish the existing grass pitch.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Prince William meeting local school children on his visit to Memorial Park<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" For many months there has been growing confusion about the Council’s intentions for Memorial Park (sometimes known as St Marks Park). During the summer RBKC carried out a consultation, in the form of a questionnaire on possible ‘improvements’ to the … Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>